This is a
comparison of the well excepted Y10-7-13 Yagi VHF antenna to the new and unique
VHF offering from Antennas Direct called the C5.
Y10-7-13
C5
On one hand it may seem a little unfair to be pitting the 10
element Yagi desisgn of the Y10-7-13 against the loop design represented by the
C5. However, the C5's form factor and aesthetics are novel, and
establishing its sensitivity relative to the Y10-7-13 comes
Channels 7, 8, and 13:
Conclusions At the low end the Y10-7-13 is about 3 dB more sensitive
than the C5, and at the high end about 6 to 7 dB.
From a sensitivity perspective these two antennas are not intended to be
regarded in the same class. The Y10-7-13 has been for some time one of the
highest gain VHF antennas on the US market without resorting to big $$$ and/or
importing. Its gain ranges from about 10 dB to 12 dB. On the other
hand the published specs for the C5 are in the range of 6.5 to 7.5 dB, and the
C5's sensitivity is therefore, by design, about 1/4 the sensitivity of the
Y10-7-13.
It should be pointed out that the signals being received at the test location
are subject to difraction (knife edge effect). In between the receiving
location at about 6500 feet is a mountain ridge at about 10,000 feet, with the
transmitting towers on the other side of the ridge at about 8500 feet.
Nevertheless, the "flatness" of the signals (absence/presence of significant
comb filtering effects) is comparable for both designs.
It should be kept in mind that for DTV's ATSC modulation, a flat response across
a given channel is most often just as critical a contributor to quality, if not
moreso, than amplitude. The signals at the test location from these two
antennas produced nearly equal digital "quality". The Channel 13 signal
was just a few points off from the Y10-7-13. [The slight pertebation in
the C5's Ch 13 signal (versus the Y10-7-13) could be corrected with a slight
relocation].
What is novel about the C5 are its aesthetics. Its low profile design is a
revolution in VHF rooftop gaudiness; not much more of a profile than a common
satellite antenna.
For really deep fringe area scenarios the Y10-7-13 will most likely serve better. But for
70-90% of the urban and suburban market areas, the C5 could serve quite well,
and much less obtrusively.